Indian Bank
Indian Bank is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 30.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Indian Bank has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Mallal & Namazie | 2 cases |
Mallal & Namzie | 1 case |
Haridass Ho & Partners | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Indian Bank's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 5.1
- Complex Cases
- 3 (30.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 33.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 26.5 parties avg |
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 46.8 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 14.0 parties avg |
2018 | 110.0 parties avg |
2017 | 118.0 parties avg |
2016 | 13.0 parties avg |
2015 | 13.0 parties avg |
2014 | 13.0 parties avg |
2003 | 12.0 parties avg |
2002 | 12.0 parties avg |
2001 | 23.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Indian Bank's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(30.0%) |
Neutral | 2(20.0%) |
Partial | 1(10.0%) |
Won | 4(40.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.004 cases |
USD | 5,270,080.122 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
2017 | 1 1 |
2016 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
2014 | 1 1 |
2003 | 1 1 |
2002 | 1 1 |
2001 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 10 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
24 Nov 2021 | Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim | WonAppeal allowed and judgment given to the bank in the sum of US$546,920.78. |
15 Mar 2018 | Defendant | NeutralShare of sales proceeds determined by the rolling charge method. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) |
01 Mar 2017 | Defendant | WonEntitled to claim proceeds from the sale of pepper stock in proportion to their contribution. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
22 May 2016 | Respondent, Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed. Liable to honour the Letter of Credit and pay pre-judgment interest. |
29 Dec 2015 | Defendant | WonDefendant's application for a stay of the Singapore proceedings was granted. |
29 Dec 2014 | Defendant | LostJudgment entered against Indian Bank for US$9,993,239.45 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and international trade). |
08 Apr 2003 | Plaintiff | WonApplication by the defendant to set aside a judgment in default as well as a winding-up order was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Sep 2002 | Defendant | PartialAppeal allowed in part; damages reassessed as at the date of conversion. |
16 Oct 2001 | Defendant | NeutralOutcome for Indian Bank is not available. |
16 Oct 2001 | Defendant | LostThe Indian Bank's counterclaim against Panwell is dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |