La Dolce Vita Fine Dining Company Limited
La Dolce Vita Fine Dining Company Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 80.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
La Dolce Vita Fine Dining Company Limited has been represented by 2 law firms and 9 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Oon & Bazul LLP | 1 case |
| Cavenagh Law LLP | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of La Dolce Vita Fine Dining Company Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 5.4
- Complex Cases
- 5 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Partial | 15.0 parties avg |
| Won | 45.5 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 16.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 25.5 parties avg |
| 2016 | 25.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of La Dolce Vita Fine Dining Company Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Partial | 1(20.0%) |
| Won | 4(80.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 17,500.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 1 |
| 2022 | 2 11 |
| 2016 | 1 2 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
26 Jun 2023 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonAppeal upheld; costs of $35,000 awarded to the respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
01 Nov 2022 | Plaintiff | WonReceivers appointed over the Bank Accounts. |
20 Apr 2022 | Plaintiff | PartialAppeal dismissed but order varied to allow discovery of specific documents. |
14 Aug 2016 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonAppeal allowed against the costs orders of the AR and granted the Plaintiffs costs here and below, to be taxed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
25 Feb 2016 | Plaintiff | WonApplication for pre-action discovery granted. |