Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit)

Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit) is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit) has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.

Law FirmCases Handled
Engelin Teh Practice LLC2 cases

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.0
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Partial22.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201212.0 parties avg
201012.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Wei Kong (by his litigation representative Lee Swee Chit)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Partial2(100.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.002 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20121
1
20101
1

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
12 Jan 2012
AppellantPartialAppeal allowed in part, with adjustments to damages for loss of future earnings, future psychiatric treatment, and mother's pre-trial loss of income. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28 Dec 2010
Plaintiff, RespondentPartialPlaintiff's appeals against the dismissals of claims for future speech physiotherapy and occupational therapy costs, future nursing care, and future loss of earnings of the mother were dismissed. The award for pain and suffering and loss of amenities was reduced to $160,000, the award for the loss of earning capacity was reduced to $250,000, the award for costs of future psychiatric treatment was reduced to $90,000, and the award for the mother’s loss of income was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.