Lim Siew Fern

Lim Siew Fern is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lim Siew Fern has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Cairnhill Law LLC	1 case	Ashok Kumar Rai Derek Kang Yu Hsien
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Derek Kang Charmaine Kong Edwin Chua

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Siew Fern's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Siew Fern's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	10,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-327 16 Nov 2023	16 Nov 2023	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application for disclosure of the Four Invoices was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to the defendants on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2016-sghc-51 31 Mar 2016	31 Mar 2016	Plaintiff	WonOppression Claim allowed. Mdm Lim to be bought out to enable her to realise the value of the Shares held as a nominee of Seaquest at a fair value pursuant to s 216(2)(d) of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 2006 Rev Ed) as valued by an independent valuer, on the basis of a fair market value as of the date of the oral judgment (ie, 3 December 2015).