Ashok Kumar Rai

Ashok Kumar Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 7.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 27% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated expertise across 59 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	9 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	8 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lasting Power of Attorney	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Existence of debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Substitutive compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determinations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Expert Determination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ashok Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ashok Kumar Rai has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cairnhill Law LLC	11 cases	73% of cases	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2025) Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award(Jan 2024) Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute(Nov 2023)
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	3 cases	20% of cases	Industrial Floor & Systems Pte Ltd v Civil Tech Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Stay of Proceedings(Mar 2019) United Integrated Services v Civil Tech: Stay of Enforcement under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act(Feb 2019) QS-First Pte Ltd v Goh Tuan Keong: Discovery of Documents & Compliance with Rules of Court(Apr 2018)
Chan Neo LLP	1 cases	7% of cases	Aik Heng v Deshin: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Determination Dispute(Nov 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ashok Kumar Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 4 (27%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	113.1 parties avg	3.1	73%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2020	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2022	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ashok Kumar Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(73%)	73%
Partial	3(20%)	20%
Won	1(7%)	7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	640,568.91	71,174.329 cases	9
USD	700,000.00	700,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 12 Feb 2025 Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Partial	12 Feb 2025	Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, specifically regarding the Balance Work Counterclaim. The award was set aside insofar as it concerns the Balance Work Counterclaim.
2	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award 31 Jan 2024 Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	31 Jan 2024	Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed. Costs of S$15,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lim Siew Fern v Tan Beng Yong: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute 16 Nov 2023 Lim Siew Fern (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Nov 2023	Lim Siew Fern (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for disclosure of the Four Invoices was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to the defendants on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Stay of Adjudication Enforcement 26 Feb 2023 Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	26 Feb 2023	Wan Sern Metal Industries Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent in the amount of $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lazarus Century Construction v SLH Development: Debt Recovery Dispute 07 Nov 2022 Lazarus Century Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Nov 2022	Lazarus Century Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim that the defendant failed to repay a loan was dismissed. The garnished sum of $86,355.33 and the sum of $300 for bank charges are to be returned to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd v Raffles Asset Management: Cost Allocation in Fraudulent Inducement Case 27 Jan 2022 AKS Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2022	AKS Consultants Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs awarded againstCosts of $300,000 plus disbursements awarded against the second to fourth defendants jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Epoch Minerals v Raffles Asset Management: Conspiracy, Dishonest Assistance, and Misrepresentation in US$10M Loan Agreement 16 Dec 2021 Kamil Bin Jumat (Defendant)Lost	16 Dec 2021	Kamil Bin Jumat (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the second, third, and fourth defendants for a total of US$700,000.
8	ULP v ULS: LPA Revocation Based on Undue Pressure; Mental Capacity Act 05 Jul 2021 ULS (Respondent)Lost	05 Jul 2021	ULS (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed against the respondent.
9	Koh Kim Teck v Shook Lin & Bok LLP: Setting Aside Statutory Demand & Validity of Service 09 Dec 2020 Koh Kim Teck (Appellant)Lost	09 Dec 2020	Koh Kim Teck (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $24,000 (including disbursements) to be paid by the appellant to the respondent. The usual consequential orders are to apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Lim Beng Kiat v Mohammad Sarman bin Saidi: Contract Formation, Resulting Trusts, and Substitutive Compensation 18 Nov 2020 Lim Beng Kiat (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	18 Nov 2020	Lim Beng Kiat (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with respect to the Car. The respondent is to pay the appellant damages to be assessed by the DJ in accordance with [48] and [49] above. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Koh Kim Teck v. Shook Lin & Bok LLP: Bankruptcy - Setting Aside Statutory Demand 28 Apr 2020 Koh Kim Teck (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	28 Apr 2020	Koh Kim Teck (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 to be paid to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Industrial Floor & Systems Pte Ltd v Civil Tech Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application & Stay of Proceedings 05 Mar 2019 Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	05 Mar 2019	Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding-up order grantedOrder to be wound up due to an undisputed debt of S$292,568.91 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	United Integrated Services v Civil Tech: Stay of Enforcement under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 13 Feb 2019 Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	13 Feb 2019	Civil Tech Pte Ltd (Respondent): Stay of enforcement grantedStay of enforcement of the first adjudication determination was granted without condition.
14	QS-First Pte Ltd v Goh Tuan Keong: Discovery of Documents & Compliance with Rules of Court 12 Apr 2018 QS-FIRST PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Apr 2018	QS-FIRST PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Application Partially AllowedApplication for specific discovery partially allowed. Defendants to file affidavits for certain document categories.
15	Aik Heng v Deshin: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Determination Dispute 08 Nov 2015 Aik Heng Contracts and Services Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	08 Nov 2015	Aik Heng Contracts and Services Pte Ltd (Applicant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and application for stay of execution dismissed; costs fixed at $2,000, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).