Lingkesvaran Rajendaren

Lingkesvaran Rajendaren is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 9 complex cases, representing 90.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lingkesvaran Rajendaren has been represented by 2 law firms and 2 counsels.

Law FirmCases Handled
Ram Goswami1 case
K K Cheng & Co1 case

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lingkesvaran Rajendaren's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
16.9
Complex Cases
9 (90.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost720.7 parties avg
Neutral28.0 parties avg
18.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
2025132.0 parties avg
2024415.3 parties avg
2023221.0 parties avg
2022215.5 parties avg
201813.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lingkesvaran Rajendaren's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost7(70.0%)
Neutral2(20.0%)
1(10.0%)

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20251
1
20243
121
20231
2
20221
2
20181
1

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
04 Feb 2025
ApplicantLostApplication dismissed due to lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
07 Nov 2024
OtherNeutralThe real parties in interest are the Claimants, and ordinarily, they should bear the costs. However, in the present circumstances, the court makes no order as to costs.
24 Sep 2024
OtherUnknown
26 Mar 2024
Appellant, ApplicantLostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing.
29 Jan 2024
OtherNeutralOutcome for Lingkesvaran is neutral in this application for ad hoc admission.
04 Dec 2023
ApplicantLostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
24 May 2023
ApplicantLostApplication for reinstatement of appeal and extension of time to file documents was dismissed.
24 Nov 2022
ClaimantLostApplication for a declaration that the Presumptions contained in Section 18(1) and 18(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1973 which were imposed upon the Claimants should be read down and given effect as imposing an evidential burden only in Compliance with Articles 9(1) and 12(1) of the Constitution and the Common law Presumption of innocence was dismissed.
03 Aug 2022
Appellant, ClaimantLostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed.
28 Oct 2018
DefendantLostLingkesvaran Rajendaren was found guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.