Ram Goswami

Ram Goswami is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 25 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 4.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 16% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ram Goswami has demonstrated expertise across 41 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	25 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 25 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	20 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	19 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence	14 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	11 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Human Trafficking Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Sex	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prostitution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undercover Operations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ram Goswami has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ram Goswami has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 21 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ram Goswami	21 cases	84% of cases	PP v Hashim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2023) PP v Kannan: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2021) Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nur Azam: Drug Importation & Consumption Sentencing(Mar 2020)
K Ravi Law Corporation	2 cases	8% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2010) Public Prosecutor v Pausi bin Jefridin & Roslan bin Bakar: Trafficking Diamorphine & Methamphetamine(Apr 2010)
M/s Ram Goswami	1 cases	4% of cases	Lim Seng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & CDSA Offences in Private Banking(Dec 2014)
Ram Goswani & Co	1 cases	4% of cases	Ng Beng Siang v PP: Conspiracy & Trafficking of Diamorphine; Common Intention(Apr 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ram Goswami's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 4 (16%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	232.7 parties avg	2.7	92%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2015	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ram Goswami's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	23(92%)	92%
Partial	1(4%)	4%
Won	1(4%)	4%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 25 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Hashim: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 11 Jun 2023 Jayacelan A/L Kerusnan (Defendant)Lost	11 Jun 2023	Jayacelan A/L Kerusnan (Defendant): ConvictedJayacelan was convicted of trafficking in a controlled drug and sentenced to imprisonment for life and 15 strokes of the cane.
2	PP v Kannan: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 14 Feb 2021 Kannan s/o R Kumaran (Defendant)Lost	14 Feb 2021	Kannan s/o R Kumaran (Defendant): Guilty as chargedKannan was found guilty as charged and sentenced to the mandatory punishment of death.
3	Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nur Azam: Drug Importation & Consumption Sentencing 17 Mar 2020 Mohammad Juani bin Ali (Defendant)Lost	17 Mar 2020	Mohammad Juani bin Ali (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedSentenced to 29 years’ and 15 strokes imprisonment for conspiring with the Accused to import not less than 499.9 grams of cannabis into Singapore on 14 April 2016.
4	PP v Lokman & Mubin: Drug Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Abetment by Instigation 09 Mar 2020 Mohamed Mubin bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2020	Mohamed Mubin bin Abdul Rahman (Defendant): Convicted of abetment and drug traffickingConvicted of abetting Lokman to traffic diamorphine to Edy and trafficking diamorphine by giving it to Lokman to return to him.
5	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Shalleh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Apr 2019 Mohamed Shalleh Bin Abdul Latiff (Defendant)Lost	09 Apr 2019	Mohamed Shalleh Bin Abdul Latiff (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of possession of not less than 54.04g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
6	Public Prosecutor v Tangaraju: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy & Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Dec 2018 Tangaraju s/o Suppiah (Defendant)Lost	30 Dec 2018	Tangaraju s/o Suppiah (Defendant): ConvictionThe accused was convicted of abetting by engaging in a conspiracy with one Mogan Valo to traffic in cannabis.
7	Public Prosecutor v Lingkesvaran Rajendaren: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Oct 2018 Lingkesvaran Rajendaren (Defendant)Lost	28 Oct 2018	Lingkesvaran Rajendaren (Defendant): Convicted and sentenced to deathLingkesvaran Rajendaren was found guilty of drug trafficking and sentenced to death.
8	Public Prosecutor v Gunasilan Nadarajah: Trafficking of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 31 Jul 2018 Gunasilan Nadarajah (Defendant)Lost	31 Jul 2018	Gunasilan Nadarajah (Defendant): Life imprisonment and caningThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
9	Harven v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Rebutting Presumption of Knowledge under Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Mar 2017 Harven a/l Segar (Appellant)Won	09 Mar 2017	Harven a/l Segar (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppellant acquitted of all charges.
10	Obeng Comfort v Public Prosecutor: Misuse of Drugs Act - Importation of Methamphetamine 14 Feb 2017 Obeng Comfort (Appellant)Lost	14 Feb 2017	Obeng Comfort (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
11	PP v Suventher Shanmugam: Illegally Importing Cannabis into Singapore 30 Aug 2016 Suventher Shanmugam (Accused)Lost	30 Aug 2016	Suventher Shanmugam (Accused): Accused ConvictedAccused sentenced to 23 years imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
12	Public Prosecutor v Obeng Comfort: Importation of Methamphetamine 02 Dec 2015 Obeng Comfort (Defendant)Lost	02 Dec 2015	Obeng Comfort (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty of importing methamphetamine.
13	PP v Masoud Rahimi & Mogan Raj: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Nov 2015 Mogan Raj Terapadisamy (Defendant)Lost	03 Nov 2015	Mogan Raj Terapadisamy (Defendant): Imprisonment and caningMogan Raj was found guilty and sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
14	Lim Seng Soon v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & CDSA Offences in Private Banking 22 Dec 2014 Lim Seng Soon (Appellant)Partial	22 Dec 2014	Lim Seng Soon (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partTotal sentence reduced from six years to 4½ years' imprisonment.
15	PP v Low Chuan Woo: Culpable Homicide, Women's Charter Offences & Bar Fine Arrangement 24 Jun 2014 Low Chuan Woo (Defendant)Lost	24 Jun 2014	Low Chuan Woo (Defendant): Convicted and SentencedThe accused was convicted of culpable homicide and offences under the Women's Charter and sentenced to imprisonment.
16	Loh Kian Ann v Public Prosecutor: Statutory Rape Conviction Appeal 29 May 2014 Loh Kian Ann (Appellant)Lost	29 May 2014	Loh Kian Ann (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his conviction was dismissed.
17	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Sep 2010 Rosman bin Abdullah (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2010	Rosman bin Abdullah (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was convicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
18	Public Prosecutor v Pausi bin Jefridin & Roslan bin Bakar: Trafficking Diamorphine & Methamphetamine 21 Apr 2010 Roslan bin Bakar (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2010	Roslan bin Bakar (Defendant): Guilty as chargedRoslan was found guilty as charged.
19	Ng Beng Siang v PP: Conspiracy & Trafficking of Diamorphine; Common Intention 16 Apr 2003 Rosely Bin Sidin (Appellant)Lost	16 Apr 2003	Rosely Bin Sidin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedRosely Bin Sidin's appeal against his conviction and sentence was dismissed.
20	PP v Azman bin Ismail: Joint Drug Trafficking at Cascadale Condominium 11 Aug 2002 Mohamed Isnin bin Saleh (Defendant)Lost	11 Aug 2002	Mohamed Isnin bin Saleh (Defendant): GuiltyMohamed Isnin bin Saleh was found guilty of drug trafficking.
21	Thongthot Yordsa-Art v PP: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object & Murder 09 Jul 2002 Dornchinnamat Yingyos (Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2002	Dornchinnamat Yingyos (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
22	PP v Thongthot Yordsa-Art: Unlawful Assembly & Murder under Penal Code s 149 24 Feb 2002 Dornchinnamat Yingyos (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2002	Dornchinnamat Yingyos (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of the crime.
23	Muhammad Afzal Khan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy 18 Jun 2001 Muhammad Afzal Khan (Appellant)Lost	18 Jun 2001	Muhammad Afzal Khan (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
24	PP v Muhammad Ali Hashim: Trafficking Diamorphine - Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2001 Muhammad Afzal Khan (Defendant)Lost	20 Apr 2001	Muhammad Afzal Khan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of conspiring to traffic in a controlled drug.
25	Public Prosecutor v Pillai Dominic Cornelius: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 23 May 2000 Pillai Dominic Cornelius (Defendant)Lost	23 May 2000	Pillai Dominic Cornelius (Defendant): Guilty of amended chargeThe accused was found guilty on the amended charge of trafficking 1,177.28g of cannabis.