Low Heng Leon Andy

Low Heng Leon Andy is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Low Heng Leon Andy has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
August Law Corporation	2 cases	Tan Wen Cheng Adrian Low Zhi Yu Janus
Tan Jin Hwee LLC	1 case	Aloysius Tan Gopinath S/O Pillai
Eldan Law LLP	1 case	Gopinath S/O Pillai

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Heng Leon Andy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Heng Leon Andy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	240,000.00	80,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sgca-48 14 Aug 2018	14 Aug 2018	Appellant, Plaintiff	WonEquitable compensation awarded in the sum of $140,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2017-sghc-200 15 Aug 2017	15 Aug 2017	Plaintiff, Appellant	PartialDamages increased to $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2013-sghc-101 09 May 2013	09 May 2013	Plaintiff	NeutralThe appeal against the decision to dismiss the striking out application was dismissed, allowing the case to proceed to trial.
4	2011-sghc-184 04 Aug 2011	04 Aug 2011	Plaintiff	PartialPlaintiff was ordered to amend his statement of claim to properly reflect his proprietary estoppel claim.