Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd
Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 13.0 parties avg |
2012 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(50.0%) |
Won | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
17 Oct 2013 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; the Tribunal did have jurisdiction to determine and/or adjudicate upon the dispute between the Appellant and the Respondent arising out of the Supplemental Agreements. The disbursements and fees paid in the arbitration were to be indemnified by the Respondent. The costs of the arbitration were to be paid to the Appellant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Nov 2012 | Respondent | WonIRCP's application challenging the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction was dismissed. |