Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd
Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 7 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Eldan Law LLP | 2 cases |
| Infinitus Law Corporation | 6 cases |
| Prithipal & Associates | 1 case |
| Rada & Associates | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.8
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 13.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 43.0 parties avg |
| Won | 52.6 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2017 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2016 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2011 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2010 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2009 | 23.0 parties avg |
| 2008 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2007 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2006 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(10.0%) |
| Partial | 4(40.0%) |
| Won | 5(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 1,351,484.865 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 1 |
| 2016 | 1 1 |
| 2012 | 1 1 |
| 2011 | 1 1 |
| 2010 | 1 1 |
| 2009 | 2 11 |
| 2008 | 1 1 |
| 2007 | 1 1 |
| 2006 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 10 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
13 Feb 2017 | Plaintiff | PartialPlaintiff was awarded costs on a standard basis from 31 October 2007 to 2 February 2010 against UOB, but UOB was awarded costs on a standard basis from 3 February 2010 to 19 December 2012 and on an indemnity basis from 20 December 2012 to date. There was no order as to costs between the Plaintiff and FCC. |
27 Dec 2016 | Plaintiff | PartialJudgment for the Plaintiff against First Currency Choice Pte Ltd in the amount of S$4,795,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
19 Jul 2012 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; an inquiry by the registrar on damages or account of profits will be conducted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
19 Dec 2011 | Plaintiff | PartialAccount of profits ordered against United Overseas Bank Limited. |
02 Mar 2010 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; UOB to pay Main-Line $1,962,424.30 as interim payment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
15 Oct 2009 | Plaintiff, Appellant | WonMain-Line's appeals against the Assistant Registrar's order were allowed. |
22 Sep 2009 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostPlaintiff's appeal against the decision to set aside the interim payment order was dismissed. |
09 Apr 2008 | Plaintiff | PartialApplication for discovery granted in part, with specific documents to be disclosed by the second defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
30 Oct 2007 | Respondent | WonJudgment for the Respondent; appeals dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
20 Dec 2006 | Plaintiff | WonThe court found the patent valid and infringed by the defendants. |