Mok Wai Hoe

Mok Wai Hoe is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Mok Wai Hoe has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eldan Law LLP	2 cases	Lee Peng Khoon Edwin Chan Ying Keet Jasmine Poonam Bai d/o Ramakrishnan Gnanasekaran

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mok Wai Hoe's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	110.0 parties avg	10.0	50.0%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mok Wai Hoe's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2014-sgca-30 22 May 2014	22 May 2014	Respondent	PartialAppeal partially unsuccessful; rulings on Motions 8 and 9 invalidated; rejection of Contested Votes on Motion 2 invalidated; direction on amendments to Motions 1(b) and 1(e) set aside. Costs to be borne by the 1st Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2013-sghc-226 27 Oct 2013	27 Oct 2013	Defendant	DismissedThe Plaintiffs’ application to invalidate the 1st Defendant’s ruling on Motions 3(a), 3(b), 8 and 9 are validated; the other orders sought by the Plaintiffs were refused.