Murugesan a/l Arumugam

Murugesan a/l Arumugam is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms.

Legal Representation

Murugesan a/l Arumugam has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Sterling Law Corporation	1 case	Sankar s/o Kailasa Thevar Saminathan Sankar s/o Saminathan
MSC Law Corporation	1 case	Chia Soo Michael Soh Hui Bin Hany Michael Chia Hany Soh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Murugesan a/l Arumugam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75.0%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Murugesan a/l Arumugam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75.0%)	75.0%
Neutral	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sgca-118 27 Dec 2021	27 Dec 2021	Applicant	LostThe applicant's criminal motion was dismissed summarily without a hearing.
2	2021-sgca-32 05 Apr 2021	05 Apr 2021	Appellant	LostThe appeal against the sentence of 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane was dismissed.
3	2020-sghc-203 28 Sep 2020	28 Sep 2020	Defendant	LostThe accused was convicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
4	2019-sghc-268 13 Nov 2019	13 Nov 2019	Defendant	NeutralThe judgment primarily concerns the admissibility of statements by Mohamed Ansari. The outcome for Murugesan is not specified in this extract.