Public Prosecutor v Murugesan: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act

In Public Prosecutor v Murugesan a/l Arumugam, the High Court of Singapore convicted Murugesan for trafficking not less than 14.99g of diamorphine under s 5(1)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act. Murugesan pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. The court considered Murugesan's role as a mere courier, the absence of aggravating factors, and his genuine remorse in determining the sentence.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Accused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Murugesan was convicted for trafficking diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act and sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyJudgment for the ProsecutionWonTerence Chua, Regina Lim, Lu Yiwei
Murugesan a/l ArumugamDefendantIndividualConvicted and SentencedLostChia Soo Michael, Soh Hui Bin Hany, Sankar s/o Kailasa Thevar Saminathan

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Dedar Singh GillJudgeYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Terence ChuaAttorney-General’s Chambers
Regina LimAttorney-General’s Chambers
Lu YiweiAttorney-General’s Chambers
Chia Soo MichaelMSC Law Corporation
Soh Hui Bin HanyMSC Law Corporation
Sankar s/o Kailasa Thevar SaminathanSterling Law Corporation

4. Facts

  1. The accused, Murugesan, a Malaysian, was 32 years old at the time of the offense.
  2. On 24 March 2016, Murugesan delivered two packets of diamorphine to Mohamed Ansari bin Mohamed Abdul Aziz (B2) at Lengkong Tiga.
  3. Murugesan received $5,880 in exchange for the drugs.
  4. CNB officers arrested Murugesan, B2, and others at the scene.
  5. The drugs were found to contain not less than 14.99g of diamorphine.
  6. Murugesan admitted he was instructed by 'Ismail' to deliver the drugs and collect money.
  7. Murugesan was promised RM500 for delivering the drugs.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v Murugesan a/l Arumugam, Criminal Case No 18 of 2020, [2020] SGHC 203

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Accused transported drugs to Lengkong Tiga carpark.
Accused exchanged drugs for $5,880.
Accused arrested by CNB officers.
Accused remanded.
Exhibits submitted to HSA for analysis.
HSA analysis results disclosed.
Accused convicted of two driving-related offences.
Hearing date.
Judgment date.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Trafficking of Diamorphine
    • Outcome: The court convicted the accused of trafficking diamorphine.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Appropriate Sentence for Drug Trafficking
    • Outcome: The court imposed a sentence of 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
    • Category: Procedural

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Imprisonment
  2. Caning

9. Cause of Actions

  • Trafficking in controlled drugs

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Public Prosecutor v Tan Lye HengHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 564SingaporeCited for the sentencing range for trafficking between 13.01g and 14.99g of diamorphine.
Public Prosecutor v Lai Teck GuanHigh CourtYes[2018] 5 SLR 852SingaporeCited for establishing the indicative sentencing range for a first-time offender trafficking 13 to 14.99g of diamorphine.
Amin bin Abdullah v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2017] 5 SLR 904SingaporeCited for holding that 26–29 years’ imprisonment was the indicative sentencing range for a first-time offender trafficking 13g to 14.99g of diamorphine.
Public Prosecutor v Tay Beng Guan AlbertHigh CourtYes[2000] 2 SLR(R) 778SingaporeCited for the principle that a sentencing discount may not be warranted where the Prosecution would have no difficulty in proving the charge against the accused.
Public Prosecutor v Vashan a/l K RamanHigh CourtYes[2019] SGHC 151SingaporeCited as a case where the sentencing court took into account the accused’s limited role and imposed sentences that fell below 26 years’ imprisonment.
Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Nor Haiqal bin ShamanHigh CourtYes[2017] SGHC 292SingaporeCited as a case where the sentencing courts took into account the accused’s limited role and imposed sentences that fell below 26 years’ imprisonment.
Vasentha d/o Joseph v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2015] 5 SLR 122SingaporeCited for setting out the appropriate sentencing framework for drug trafficking offences involving diamorphine.
Suventher Shanmugam v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2017] 2 SLR 115SingaporeCited for affirming the sentencing framework for drug trafficking offences involving diamorphine.
Loo Pei Xiang Alan v Public ProsecutorHigh CourtYes[2015] 5 SLR 500SingaporeCited for holding that an offender who traffics between 10g and 15g of diamorphine is to be considered as culpable as a person who traffics between 167g and 250g of methamphetamine.
K Saravanan Kuppusamy v Public ProsecutorCourt of AppealYes[2016] 5 SLR 88SingaporeCited for observing that the overall tenor of the punishment provisions for ss 5 and 7 of the Act is similar.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 5(1)(a)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185, 2008 Rev Ed) s 33(1)Singapore
Misuse of Drugs Act Second ScheduleSingapore
Misuse of Drugs Act s 7Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Diamorphine
  • Drug trafficking
  • Courier
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • CNB
  • HSA
  • Remorse

15.2 Keywords

  • Drug trafficking
  • Diamorphine
  • Misuse of Drugs Act
  • Singapore
  • Criminal Law
  • Sentencing

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Sentencing

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Statutory Offences
  • Criminal Procedure and Sentencing
  • Sentencing
  • Misuse of Drugs Act