Neocorp Innovations Pte Ltd

Neocorp Innovations Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Neocorp Innovations Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Mallal and Namazie	1 case	Tan Teng Muan Mirza Namazie Wong Khai Leng
KhattarWong	1 case	Chan Kia Pheng Shaun Koh Kang Ming
Khattar Wong	1 case	Chan Kia Pheng Shaun Koh Kang Ming

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Neocorp Innovations Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Neocorp Innovations Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2006-sgca-15 06 Apr 2006	06 Apr 2006	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent. The court held that the liquidator could not continue the action commenced by the judicial manager under s 227T of the Companies Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2005-sghc-167 07 Sep 2005	07 Sep 2005	Respondent	WonThe court granted the creditor's applications, preventing the liquidators from continuing the action and striking out the original application.
3	2005-sghc-116 29 Jun 2005	29 Jun 2005	Defendant	LostDefendant's claim that it was not liable for the outstanding payments was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).