Ong Boon Lin Lester
Ong Boon Lin Lester is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm.
Legal Representation
Ong Boon Lin Lester has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Dhillon & Partners | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Ong Boon Lin Lester's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 12.0 parties avg |
2011 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Ong Boon Lin Lester's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(50.0%) |
Neutral | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 240,868.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 1 1 |
2011 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
25 Aug 2013 | Defendant | LostJudgment against the Defendant for the Principal Amount of $240,868.00, default interest on the Principal Amount of $240,868.00 at the contractual rate of 12% per annum calculated from 15 August 2010 until the date of receipt of full payment by the Plaintiff; and costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 Mar 2011 | Defendant | NeutralLeave to defend granted upon the condition that the defendant pay into court, or provide security by way of a banker’s guarantee, the full amount of the claim (ie the sum of $240,868.00 with interest on the said sum at the annual rate of 12% from 14 August 2010 until 25 March 2011 (without prejudice to the plaintiff’s claimed sums as stated in its pleadings)), by 26 April 2011, failing which the plaintiff would be at liberty to enter final judgment against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |