Ong Wui Teck

Ong Wui Teck is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 18.2% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 27.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ong Wui Teck has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Joo Toon & Co	2 cases	Lim Joo Toon Tan Chin Aik Joseph
Independent Practitioner	2 cases	Ong Wui Teck
Soh Wong & Yap	1 case	Soh Gim Chuan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ong Wui Teck's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 3 (27.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.4 parties avg	2.4	63.6%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9.1%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9.1%
Won	25.0 parties avg	5.0	18.2%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ong Wui Teck's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(63.6%)	63.6%
Other	1(9.1%)	9.1%
Partial	1(9.1%)	9.1%
Won	2(18.2%)	18.2%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,400.00	1,280.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 21	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sgca-104 14 Nov 2021	14 Nov 2021	Appellant, Applicant	LostThe appeal was dismissed as wholly unmeritorious.
2	2020-sgca-17 23 Mar 2020	23 Mar 2020	Appellant, Respondent	LostThe appellant's appeals against liability and sentence for contempt of court were dismissed.
3	2019-sgca-61 07 Nov 2019	07 Nov 2019	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part in relation to the $20,000 Claims and the Medical Expenses Claim.
4	2019-sghc-147 09 Jun 2019	09 Jun 2019	Respondent	LostMr. Ong was committed to prison for seven days for contempt and ordered to pay legal costs including disbursements to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2019-sghc-30 12 Feb 2019	12 Feb 2019	Respondent	LostOng Wui Teck was found guilty of scandalising contempt and contempt in the face of the court.
6	2018-sghc-49 04 Mar 2018	04 Mar 2018	Respondent	LostMr. Ong's application for a stay of the committal application was dismissed with costs of $5,500 with $586 as disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2016-sghc-42 20 Mar 2016	20 Mar 2016	Plaintiff	OtherJudge recused himself from hearing the disputes with Mdm Ong in respect of the mother’s estate.
8	2014-sghc-157 06 Aug 2014	06 Aug 2014	Respondent, Appellant	LostThe Brother's appeal (RA 54/2014) against the costs order was dismissed in part. The court ordered the Brother to pay $400 as costs of the inquiry to the Sister. The Brother was not granted an extension of time to appeal against the substantive decision of AR Leong.
9	2012-sghc-216 29 Oct 2012	29 Oct 2012	Defendant	LostInquiry ordered before the Registrar of the Supreme Court to determine the total number of shares owned by the Estate and the value of all the Estate’s assets.
10	2009-sghc-50 03 Mar 2009	03 Mar 2009	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed in favour of the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	2008-sghc-72 13 May 2008	13 May 2008	Respondent, Defendant	WonApplication for extension of time to serve notice of appeal was dismissed with costs fixed at $500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).