Ong Wui Teck v Ong Wui Jin: Appeal over Executor's Costs and Accounting in Mother's Estate

Ong Wui Teck, the appellant, appealed against the High Court's decision to dismiss his application for reimbursement of costs from his mother's estate and to account for a $1,500 sum. The respondents are Ong Wui Jin, Ong Wui Leng, Ong Wui Yong and Ong Wui Swoon. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding it wholly without merit, and made no order as to costs.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Probate

1.4 Judgment Type

Ex Tempore Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Appeal concerning reimbursement of costs from the Mother's Estate and accounting for a $1,500 sum. The court dismissed the appeal as wholly without merit.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Ong Wui TeckAppellant, ApplicantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Ong Wui JinRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon
Ong Wui LengRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon
Ong Wui YongRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon
Ong Wui SwoonRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Andrew Phang Boon LeongJustice of the Court of AppealYes
Judith PrakashJustice of the Court of AppealNo
Quentin LohJudge of the Appellate DivisionNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization

4. Facts

  1. The appellant is the sole executor and trustee of his mother’s will and the sole surviving administrator of his father’s estate.
  2. The appellant sought reimbursement for costs incurred in defending himself in contempt of court proceedings.
  3. The appellant sought reimbursement for costs incurred in the administration of his father’s estate.
  4. The Judge ordered the appellant to account for a sum of $1,500 purportedly incurred on expenses for the administration of the Mother’s Estate in 2017.
  5. The appellant claimed the OCBC Shares had been transferred to his mother’s name in her capacity as an administrator of the Father’s Estate.
  6. The appellant’s 3 March 2017 letter stated that any excess or deficiency in the $1,500 sum would be accounted for in the final accounts.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Ong Wui Teck v Ong Wui Jin and others, Civil Appeal No 34 of 2021, [2021] SGCA 104

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Originating Summons No 763 of 2014 filed
Application in HC/OS 165/2016 filed
Appellant sent letter to Ong Wui Swoon regarding post-audit expenses
Statement of account of the Mother’s Estate dated
Contempt of court proceedings in CA/CA 33/2019
Contempt of court proceedings in CA/CA 112/2019
Statement of account submitted to the Judge
High Court Judge dismissed the appellant’s application
Judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Reimbursement of Costs from Mother's Estate
    • Outcome: The court held that the appellant was not entitled to recover costs incurred in the contempt of court proceedings from the Mother's Estate.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1998] 2 SLR(R) 576
      • [1897] 2 Ch 190
  2. Accounting for Sum of $1,500
    • Outcome: The court ordered the appellant to account for the $1,500 sum in the final account of the Mother's Estate.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Reimbursement of costs
  2. Reversal of order to account for $1,500 sum

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Probate
  • Estate Administration

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Rajabali Jumabhoy and others v Ameerali R Jumabhoy and othersCourt of AppealYes[1998] 2 SLR(R) 576SingaporeEndorsed the principle that an executor, administrator, or trustee is entitled to be recouped for costs properly expended to fulfill their duties.
In re Jones; Christmas v JonesCourt of ChanceryYes[1897] 2 Ch 190England and WalesEstablished the principle that a trustee is entitled to costs of proceedings unless the Court orders otherwise.
Ong Wui Teck v Ong Wui SwoonHigh CourtYes[2016] 2 SLR 1067SingaporeCited to show that the appellant's allegations of bias, dishonesty and impropriety made against Woo J were “baseless” and “invalid”.
Ong Wui Teck v Attorney-GeneralCourt of AppealYes[2020] 1 SLR 855SingaporeAppellant disagreed with the court's ruling in the contempt of court proceedings.
Ong Wui Soon v Ong Wui TeckHigh CourtYes[2013] 1 SLR 733SingaporeDiscusses the findings in relation to the shares in OCBC held by the Father’s Estate.
Ong Wui Teck (personal representative of the estate of Chew Chen Chin, deceased) v Ong Wui Soon and anotherCourt of AppealYes[2019] SGCA 61SingaporeThe appellant’s argument regarding the “accounting” work done by his wife had already been rejected by this court in the previous appeal concerning the administration of the Mother’s Estate.
Lim Oon Kuin and others v Ocean Tankers (Pte) Ltd (interim judicial managers appointed)Court of AppealYes[2021] SGCA 100SingaporeCited as an example where costs may be awarded to the successful party on an indemnity basis.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Rules of Court (Cap 322, R 5, 2014 Rev Ed), O 59 r 6(2)Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Executor
  • Trustee
  • Administrator
  • Contempt of court
  • Statement of account
  • OCBC Shares
  • Mother's Estate
  • Father's Estate

15.2 Keywords

  • Probate
  • Estate
  • Costs
  • Accounting
  • Appeal
  • Singapore

16. Subjects

  • Trusts
  • Estates
  • Civil Procedure

17. Areas of Law

  • Probate and Administration
  • Administration of Assets