Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd

Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 25.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Lisa Chong & Partners	2 cases	Lisa Chong Lisa Chong Soo Chuan
Peter Pang and Co	1 case	Peter Pang
Chor Pee and Partners	1 case	Lim Chor Pee

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	75.0%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pacrim Investments Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75.0%)	75.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2010-sghc-368 21 Dec 2010	21 Dec 2010	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostPacrim's appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the Assistant Registrar was upheld. No monetary amount was awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2010-sghc-134 02 May 2010	02 May 2010	Plaintiff	LostPacrim's claim for damages was dismissed as the court determined that the Scheme extinguished the claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2008-sgca-16 27 Mar 2008	27 Mar 2008	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs. No order on the claim for damages as no evidence was adduced by Pacrim to show that it had suffered any loss. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2004-sghc-240 24 Oct 2004	24 Oct 2004	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's application was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.