Plaintiffs in the estate of Ferdinand and E Marcos Human Rights Litigation in Case No. MDL840-R in the United States District of Hawaii
Plaintiffs in the estate of Ferdinand and E Marcos Human Rights Litigation in Case No. MDL840-R in the United States District of Hawaii is a association in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 1 case in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Plaintiffs in the estate of Ferdinand and E Marcos Human Rights Litigation in Case No. MDL840-R in the United States District of Hawaii has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Kenneth Tan Partnership | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Plaintiffs in the estate of Ferdinand and E Marcos Human Rights Litigation in Case No. MDL840-R in the United States District of Hawaii's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 7.0
- Complex Cases
- 1 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 17.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 17.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Plaintiffs in the estate of Ferdinand and E Marcos Human Rights Litigation in Case No. MDL840-R in the United States District of Hawaii's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 1(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 1 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
23 Mar 2008 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; the Republic of the Philippines was ordered to bear 50% of the costs of the respondents in the appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |