Priscilla Lim Suk Ling
Priscilla Lim Suk Ling is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Priscilla Lim Suk Ling has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Pereira & Tan LLC | 3 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Priscilla Lim Suk Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 7.7
- Complex Cases
- 3 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 17.0 parties avg |
Partial | 18.0 parties avg |
Won | 18.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 18.0 parties avg |
2023 | 17.0 parties avg |
2019 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Priscilla Lim Suk Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(33.3%) |
Partial | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 1(33.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 1 1 |
2023 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
19 May 2024 | Appellant, Defendant | WonAppeal allowed; the court found that the consent judgment limited the respondents' claim to damages for wrongful gain only. |
30 Aug 2023 | Defendant | LostThe court held that a plaintiff is entitled to plead that it is proceeding on both the wrongful gain interest and the wrongful loss interest in a claim for breach of confidence and therefore claim for both damages under the Coco approach and equitable damages under the I-Admin approach. |
17 Nov 2019 | Defendant | PartialApplication allowed in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |