Purnima Anil Salgaocar
Purnima Anil Salgaocar is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Purnima Anil Salgaocar has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC | 3 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Purnima Anil Salgaocar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 22.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 32.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Purnima Anil Salgaocar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(33.3%) |
Won | 2(66.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 11,000.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 2 12 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
12 Oct 2023 | Defendant | WonThe court dismissed the claim against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
04 Jun 2023 | Appellant, Defendant | WonAppeal allowed and injunction set aside. Costs of OA 10 and AD 81 fixed at $23,000 all in. Costs of SUM 2031 fixed at $10,000 all in. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Feb 2023 | Defendant, Appellant | LostInjunction granted against the defendant, restraining her from bringing proceedings other than for breach of the second settlement agreement, until HC/S 821/2015 is disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |