QU
QU is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
QU has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Harry Elias Partnership | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of QU's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
| Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2008 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2007 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of QU's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(50.0%) |
| Won | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 1,500.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2008 | 1 1 |
| 2007 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
09 Mar 2008 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; the Committal Order was set aside. Parties to pay their own costs in this appeal and in the High Court. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 Aug 2007 | Appellant, Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed with costs of $3,000 to be paid by the wife to the husband, such costs to be paid by means of the security deposit furnished by the wife for this appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |