Quah Su-Ling

Quah Su-Ling is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 16.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Quah Su-Ling has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 case	Sui Yi Siong Philip Fong Yeng Fatt Lau Jia Min, Jaime
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	1 case	Michael Palmer Audrey Lim
Kelvin Chia Partnership	2 cases	Thio Ying Ying Cheong Aik Hock Lim Kwee Huat

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Quah Su-Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (16.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.0 parties avg	6.0	33.3%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	16.7%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33.3%
	13.0 parties avg	3.0	16.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	32.7 parties avg	2.7

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Quah Su-Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33.3%)	33.3%
Neutral	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Won	2(33.3%)	33.3%
	1(16.7%)	16.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,832,070.53	610,690.183 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 21	Won: 2 cases (100.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2019-sghc-235 29 Sep 2019	29 Sep 2019	Defense	NeutralThe court clarified the scope of litigation privilege for the prosecution and the approach to cross-examination.
2	2016-sghc-148 27 Jul 2016	27 Jul 2016	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiffs' claims were struck out and they were found jointly and severally liable to pay damages to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2014-sghc-52 27 Mar 2014	27 Mar 2014	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal against the summary judgment and stay application was dismissed. Judgment for the sum of S$1,832,070.53 as at 2 December 2013, and default interest on that sum at the rate of the plaintiff’s prevailing prime lending rate plus 6% per annum from 3 December 2013 until the date of payment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2001-sghc-294 02 Oct 2001	02 Oct 2001	Defendant	WonJudgment in favour of the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2001-sghc-295 02 Oct 2001	02 Oct 2001	Other	Unknown
6	2001-sghc-197 23 Jul 2001	23 Jul 2001	Plaintiff	WonOrder granted in terms of the plaintiff’s application for an abridgement of time, and prayers 1 and 2 of the Originating Summons.