Richemont International SA

Richemont International SA is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Richemont International SA has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Paul Teo Dedar Singh Gill Penny Leng Penny Leng Li Yuen
Max Ng and Co	1 case	Max Ng Daryl Ong Toon Howe

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Richemont International SA's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Richemont International SA's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2006-sghc-150 21 Aug 2006	21 Aug 2006	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; an injunction was granted restraining the defendant from using the word mark 'DA VINCI' in relation to watches. An inquiry as to damages or, at the option of the plaintiff, an account of profits was ordered. The defendant must deliver up all infringing goods. Costs to the plaintiff to be taxed unless agreed. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2006-sgca-19 21 Jun 2006	21 Jun 2006	Respondent	LostInterim injunction set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2005-sghc-208 30 Oct 2005	30 Oct 2005	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.