RSP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS & ENGINEERS (PTE) LTD

RSP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS & ENGINEERS (PTE) LTD is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

RSP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS & ENGINEERS (PTE) LTD has been represented by 1 law firm and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
TSMP Law Corporation	2 cases	Koong Len Sheng Thio Shen Yi Darren Tan Tan Tho Eng Melvin Chan Melvin Chan Kah Keen

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of RSP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS & ENGINEERS (PTE) LTD's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.3
Complex Cases: 2 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	27.0 parties avg	7.0	66.7%
	111.0 parties avg	11.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	38.3 parties avg	8.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of RSP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS & ENGINEERS (PTE) LTD's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%
	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	2 21	Won: 2 cases (100.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sgca-40 03 Jul 2016	03 Jul 2016	Respondent	WonThe appeal against RSP Architects Planners & Engineers (Pte) Ltd was dismissed, and costs of the appeal were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2016-sghc-38 15 Mar 2016	15 Mar 2016	Defendant	WonThe court found that Tiong Aik and RSP were independent contractors of Mer Vue, the DSCs and NSCs were independent contractors of Tiong Aik, Squire Mech and Sitetectonix were independent contractors of RSP, Tiong Aik and RSP had limited statutory non-delegable duties under the Building Control Act with no apparent implications on their independent contractor defenses, RSP had not unreasonably delegated any of its professional duties, Mer Vue, Tiong Aik and RSP had taken proper care in the selection and appointment of their respective independent contractors, and that no private right of action is available to the Plaintiff for the alleged breach of statutory duty by Mer Vue under the BMSMA.
3	2016-sghc-28 01 Mar 2016	01 Mar 2016	Defendant	Unknown