Seah Boon Lock

Seah Boon Lock is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Seah Boon Lock has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Harpreet Singh Harpreet Singh Nehal Kelly Fan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Seah Boon Lock's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Seah Boon Lock's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100.0%)	100.0%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2008-sgca-31 15 Jul 2008	15 Jul 2008	Respondent	WonThe High Court's judgment in favor of Seah Boon Lock was upheld.
2	2007-sghc-80 24 May 2007	24 May 2007	Plaintiff	WonDamages to be assessed for FFC’s wrongful repudiation of the Agreement. An account of the total cash collected by FFC from the sales at the Yew Tee Stall for the period 1 March 2005 to 15 April 2005, and the balance sum due to be paid by FFC to Seah in respect of the said period after deduction of the relevant charges under cl 7.7 of the Agreement. Further, payment by FFC to Seah of the balance found due under cl 7.7 of the Agreement in respect of the period 1 March 2005 to 15 April 2005 on taking the above account. Judgment for the sum of $18,000, being refund of the security deposit for the Yew Tee Stall. Judgment for the sum of $30,574.73, being the overcharged licence fees for the use of the Yew Tee Stall for the period February 2004 until February 2005. Damages to be assessed for FFC’s conversion of the plaintiffs’ equipment, goods and effects at the Yew Tee Stall. Interest on the sums under sub-paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) above at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of service of the writ in this action to the date of such payment. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).