Seah Hock Thiam

Seah Hock Thiam is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Seah Hock Thiam has been represented by 2 law firms and 9 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Davinder Singh Pardeep Singh Khosa Vishal Harnal
RHTLaw Asia LLP	1 case	Sharon Chong Chin Yee Renganathan Nandakumar Nandhu Cheung Le Ying Lorraine Gayathri Sivasurian Renee Sim

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Seah Hock Thiam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%
Partial	26.0 parties avg	6.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Seah Hock Thiam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sgca-62 27 Sep 2022	27 Sep 2022	Defendant	NeutralSeah Hock Thiam did not appeal against the Judgment.
2	2021-sghc-276 08 Dec 2021	08 Dec 2021	Defendant	PartialCommon account ordered in respect of funds received from Mr. Rai and on behalf of Mr. Rai.
3	2013-sghc-136 18 Jul 2013	18 Jul 2013	Appellant	PartialAppeal against conviction dismissed. Appeal against sentence allowed in part, with the imprisonment term reduced from six weeks to one week (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).