Seeto Keong
Seeto Keong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Seeto Keong has been represented by 2 law firms and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Aldgate Chambers LLC | 1 case |
Premier Law LLC | 3 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Seeto Keong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 7.7
- Complex Cases
- 6 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 110.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 38.0 parties avg |
Won | 26.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2017 | 19.0 parties avg |
2010 | 29.0 parties avg |
2009 | 26.5 parties avg |
2008 | 16.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Seeto Keong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(16.7%) |
Neutral | 3(50.0%) |
Won | 2(33.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2017 | 1 1 |
2010 | 2 11 |
2009 | 2 11 |
2008 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
30 Nov 2017 | Defendant | NeutralThe court made findings against Seeto Keong, but did not make any orders directly against him. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
07 Sep 2010 | Defendant | LostAdverse findings made against Seeto Keong. |
28 Feb 2010 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party in this appeal. |
21 Oct 2009 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party. |
12 Jan 2009 | Respondent | WonAppeal against the individual was dismissed. |
29 Jun 2008 | Defendant | WonThe court ruled that the resolution did not contravene the Articles of Association of MDG. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |