Shakuntala Devi

Shakuntala Devi is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Shakuntala Devi has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Selvam LLC	3 cases	Sarbjit Singh Chopra Thomas Ang Ze Xi Gabriel Lee Wen Rong Ho May Kim

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shakuntala Devi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33.3%
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shakuntala Devi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	870,000.00	435,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 2	Partial: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sgca-31 05 Apr 2020	05 Apr 2020	Respondent, Appellant, Defendant	LostCA 203/2018 is dismissed.
2	2019-sghc-145 06 Jun 2019	06 Jun 2019	Defendant	PartialCosts fixed at S$150,000, with disbursements allowed as claimed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2019-sghc-138 28 May 2019	28 May 2019	Defendant	PartialNavin was ordered to pay Mrs Ram S$720,000, being arrears of the Annual Allowance for the years from 2014 to 2017. Navin was ordered to pay Mrs Ram to the extent of US$1m upon receipt of notice in writing that Mrs Ram desires to acquire a residential property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.