Shanmugam Manohar

Shanmugam Manohar is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Shanmugam Manohar has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Bajwa & Co	3 cases	Ragbir Singh s/o Ram Singh Bajwa Vengadesh s/o Kumaravelu
Global Law Alliance LLC	2 cases	Spencer Chew

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shanmugam Manohar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Remanded	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shanmugam Manohar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Remanded	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	3,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Remanded: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2025-sgca-2 12 Jan 2025	12 Jan 2025	Respondent	LostThe court ordered the Law Society to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of another Disciplinary Tribunal to hear and investigate the matter.
2	2024-sghc-28 30 Jan 2024	30 Jan 2024	Respondent	WonThe Disciplinary Tribunal found that there was no cause of sufficient gravity for disciplinary action against Mr. Manohar under s 83 of the LPA, and that a financial penalty of $3,000 was sufficient and appropriate. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2021-sghc-201 24 Aug 2021	24 Aug 2021	Respondent	RemandedThe court directed the applicant to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of another disciplinary tribunal to hear and investigate the complaint against the respondent.