Shiok Kim Seng (trading as IKO Precision Toolings)
Shiok Kim Seng (trading as IKO Precision Toolings) is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm.
Legal Representation
Shiok Kim Seng (trading as IKO Precision Toolings) has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Shiok Kim Seng (trading as IKO Precision Toolings)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Partial | 22.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 12.0 parties avg |
2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
2010 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Shiok Kim Seng (trading as IKO Precision Toolings)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(33.3%) |
Partial | 2(66.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 114,277.793 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2013 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
2010 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
17 Jan 2013 | Respondent, Appellant | LostCompensation assessed at $104,810 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
14 May 2012 | Defendant, Appellant | PartialCross appeal dismissed; appeal partially allowed. Awarded $188,817.98 for the cost of installing the mezzanine floor and $46,205.40 for the loss of opportunity to purchase the premises, plus $3,000 in legal costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
18 Aug 2010 | Defendant | PartialMr. Shiok is entitled to damages to be assessed to restore him to the position he would be in had he not entered into the two tenancy agreements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |