Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd

Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
4.0
Complex Cases
6 (100.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost14.0 parties avg
Partial24.0 parties avg
Won34.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202014.0 parties avg
201934.0 parties avg
201724.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost1(16.7%)
Partial2(33.3%)
Won3(50.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD157,500.002 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20201
1
20192
21
20172
11

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
21 Jan 2020
Defendants, ApplicantsWonDefendants' application for security for costs granted; Plaintiff ordered to furnish security for costs totaling $315,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26 Aug 2019
Defendants, ApplicantsPartialThe Defendants' application for the withdrawal of the Interrogatories was declined, with amendments to some interrogatories.
18 Feb 2019
Defendants, ApplicantsPartialThe Defendants' application for further and better particulars was partially granted and partially dismissed.
09 Jan 2019
Appellant, DefendantWonAppeal allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27 Sep 2017
Defendant, RespondentLostAppeal dismissed; the High Court does not have original jurisdiction under the Patents Act to revoke a patent by way of a counterclaim in infringement proceedings. The court assumes the currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
03 May 2017
Defendant, RespondentWonThe Defendants successfully resisted the Plaintiff's application to strike out parts of their Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection.