Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd
Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 6 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.0
- Complex Cases
- 6 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 14.0 parties avg |
Partial | 24.0 parties avg |
Won | 34.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 14.0 parties avg |
2019 | 34.0 parties avg |
2017 | 24.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Sunseap Leasing Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(16.7%) |
Partial | 2(33.3%) |
Won | 3(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 157,500.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 1 1 |
2019 | 2 21 |
2017 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
21 Jan 2020 | Defendants, Applicants | WonDefendants' application for security for costs granted; Plaintiff ordered to furnish security for costs totaling $315,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
26 Aug 2019 | Defendants, Applicants | PartialThe Defendants' application for the withdrawal of the Interrogatories was declined, with amendments to some interrogatories. |
18 Feb 2019 | Defendants, Applicants | PartialThe Defendants' application for further and better particulars was partially granted and partially dismissed. |
09 Jan 2019 | Appellant, Defendant | WonAppeal allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Sep 2017 | Defendant, Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; the High Court does not have original jurisdiction under the Patents Act to revoke a patent by way of a counterclaim in infringement proceedings. The court assumes the currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
03 May 2017 | Defendant, Respondent | WonThe Defendants successfully resisted the Plaintiff's application to strike out parts of their Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection. |