Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff

Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Mallal & Namazie	2 cases	Tan Teng Muan Loh Li Qin
Selvam LLC	1 case	Nur Rafizah bte Mohamed Abdul Gaffoor

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 2 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	112.0 parties avg	12.0	33.3%
Partial	112.0 parties avg	12.0	33.3%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2016	112.0 parties avg	12.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Syed Ahmad Jamal Alsagoff's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	15,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-85 16 Apr 2017	16 Apr 2017	Applicant	LostApplicants' summons for leave to intervene in the Original Proceedings, set aside the Original Order, and make consequential rectifications on the Registry of Deeds was dismissed. Costs of $12,000 to the first and second respondents and $3,000 to the sixth respondent were ordered (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2016-sghc-252 08 Nov 2016	08 Nov 2016	Plaintiff	PartialThe Plaintiffs' claim asserting the subsistence of their leasehold interests was successful.
3	2014-sghc-116 24 Jun 2014	24 Jun 2014	Defendant	WonPlaintiffs' application dismissed. Costs awarded to the Defendant on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.