Tan Chee Beng
Tan Chee Beng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 14 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 16.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 83.3% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tan Chee Beng has been represented by 4 law firms and 14 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP | 1 case |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 3 cases |
Rajah & Tann LLP | 1 case |
Optimus Chambers LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tan Chee Beng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 8.3
- Complex Cases
- 5 (83.3%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 47.5 parties avg |
Partial | 19.0 parties avg |
Won | 111.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 12.0 parties avg |
2019 | 111.0 parties avg |
2018 | 19.0 parties avg |
2015 | 111.0 parties avg |
2014 | 16.0 parties avg |
2012 | 111.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tan Chee Beng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 4(66.7%) |
Partial | 1(16.7%) |
Won | 1(16.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 250,166.673 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
2014 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
12 Apr 2023 | Respondent, Appellant | LostTan Chee Beng's appeal against his conviction on the Third Charge and his sentence of five months’ imprisonment was dismissed. He was convicted on all four charges. |
14 Mar 2019 | Defendant | LostLiable for costs of $435,500 jointly and severally (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
21 Nov 2018 | Appellant | PartialThe appellant was jointly and severally liable to pay damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50 and costs of $315,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for Civil Appeals Nos 168 and 171 of 2015 and the related summonses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Aug 2015 | Defendant | LostCounterclaim for bidding exercise to proceed dismissed. |
14 Oct 2014 | Defendant | LostJudgment against the Defendant for damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Nov 2012 | Defendant | WonThe defendant prevailed in the action to set aside the Consent Order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |