Tan Chee Beng

Tan Chee Beng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 14 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 16.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 83.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tan Chee Beng has been represented by 4 law firms and 14 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Chee Beng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
8.3
Complex Cases
5 (83.3%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost47.5 parties avg
Partial19.0 parties avg
Won111.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202312.0 parties avg
2019111.0 parties avg
201819.0 parties avg
2015111.0 parties avg
201416.0 parties avg
2012111.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Chee Beng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost4(66.7%)
Partial1(16.7%)
Won1(16.7%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD250,166.673 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20231
1
20191
1
20181
1
20151
1
20141
1
20121
1

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
12 Apr 2023
Respondent, AppellantLostTan Chee Beng's appeal against his conviction on the Third Charge and his sentence of five months’ imprisonment was dismissed. He was convicted on all four charges.
14 Mar 2019
DefendantLostLiable for costs of $435,500 jointly and severally (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21 Nov 2018
AppellantPartialThe appellant was jointly and severally liable to pay damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50 and costs of $315,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for Civil Appeals Nos 168 and 171 of 2015 and the related summonses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
05 Aug 2015
DefendantLostCounterclaim for bidding exercise to proceed dismissed.
14 Oct 2014
DefendantLostJudgment against the Defendant for damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11 Nov 2012
DefendantWonThe defendant prevailed in the action to set aside the Consent Order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).