Tan Jeck Min
Tan Jeck Min is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tan Jeck Min has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tan Jeck Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 7.0
- Complex Cases
- 2 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 17.0 parties avg |
Partial | 17.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2014 | 17.0 parties avg |
2013 | 17.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tan Jeck Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(50.0%) |
Partial | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2014 | 1 1 |
2013 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
20 May 2014 | Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed in part; the Judge’s decision below that Strategic is entitled to a 25% share of the $4m Dividends is overturned. The Appellants are entitled to the costs of Strategic’s claim in the Present Suit here and below. We make no order as to the costs of the Appellants’ counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Aug 2013 | Defendant | LostJudgment for the plaintiff against all defendants. Payment of $1m by the first defendant, an account of dividends received by the second, third and fourth defendants, and repayment to the plaintiff by each of the second, third and fourth defendants of the amounts of dividends by which they were respectively unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff. Interest at the Court rate on the amounts to be paid pursuant to the foregoing paragraphs from the date of the writ until the date of payment; and costs. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |