Tan Seng Kee
Tan Seng Kee is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tan Seng Kee has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Carson Law Chambers | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tan Seng Kee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.0
- Complex Cases
- 2 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 24.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 14.0 parties avg |
2020 | 14.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tan Seng Kee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(100.0%) |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 1 1 |
2020 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
27 Feb 2022 | Appellant, Plaintiff | LostAppeal dismissed; Section 377A deemed unenforceable unless Attorney-General signals change in prosecutorial policy. |
29 Mar 2020 | Plaintiff | LostApplication to declare s 377A unconstitutional was dismissed. |