Tan Shwu Leng

Tan Shwu Leng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

Tan Shwu Leng has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
V Ramakrishnan & Co	2 cases	Vangadasalam Ramakrishnan V Ramakrishnan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Shwu Leng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	32.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Shwu Leng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	352,279.33	117,426.443 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 21	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2001-sgca-70 15 Oct 2001	15 Oct 2001	Respondent	NeutralTan Shwu Leng's appeal in respect of the pre-trial earnings and the loss of future earnings as well as the costs, from the date of the offer to the date of the assessment before the Assistant Registrar, which was fixed at $1,000 was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2001-sgca-69 15 Oct 2001	15 Oct 2001	Respondent	NeutralTan Shwu Leng's appeal regarding pre-trial earnings, loss of future earnings, and costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2001-sghc-51 19 Mar 2001	19 Mar 2001	Appellant, Plaintiff	PartialAppeal allowed in part; damages awarded in the amount of $352,279.33 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).