Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co)

Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
P Suppiah and Co	3 cases	P Suppiah Elengovan Krishnan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	6,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2005-sgca-27 12 May 2005	12 May 2005	Appellant	LostThe appellant's appeal was dismissed as the court was satisfied that the appellant had not discharged her burden of proof, and the trial judge was not wrong to have rejected the allegations of fraud.
2	2004-sghc-215 26 Sep 2004	26 Sep 2004	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim for fraudulent trading was dismissed.
3	2004-sghc-84 27 Apr 2004	27 Apr 2004	Plaintiff	LostInterim orders obtained by the plaintiff were set aside, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $6,000 to the first and second defendants, as well as individual disbursements. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.