Teo Cheng Woon

Teo Cheng Woon is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Teo Cheng Woon has been represented by 3 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
B T Tan & Co	1 case	Tan Bar Tien
B T Tan and Co	1 case	Tan Bar Tien
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Harpreet Singh Nehal Chew Kiat Jinn

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Cheng Woon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.7
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	37.7 parties avg	7.7	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Cheng Woon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2007-sghc-132 20 Aug 2007	20 Aug 2007	Plaintiff	WonOrder for sale of property with vacant possession granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2006-sgca-18 13 Jun 2006	13 Jun 2006	Respondent	WonThe court ruled in favor of the respondent. No monetary amount was specified. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
3	2005-sghc-211 10 Nov 2005	10 Nov 2005	Plaintiff	WonApplication to compel the defendant company to register the plaintiff as a shareholder was allowed. Costs are to be paid by the company to the plaintiffs, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.