Tan Bar Tien

Tan Bar Tien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 24 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated expertise across 78 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 17 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Property Law	11 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forgery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Revenue Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Societies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestate succession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stamp Duties Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Instruments liable to ad valorem duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Co-broking agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Internal disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Flat	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maritime Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity of Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Articles of Association	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors' Remuneration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Complex and Multi-District Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Bar Tien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Bar Tien has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
B T Tan & Company	7 cases	29% of cases	Ong Beng Chong v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Assessment on Instruments for Vacant Possession(Apr 2019) Edmund Tie & Company v Savills Residential: Appeal for Commission Dispute over Co-broking Agreement(Apr 2018) Devagi v Tommy Wong: Misuse of Funds in Neptune Court Owners’ Association Defamation Proceedings(Jun 2017)
B T Tan & Co	7 cases	29% of cases	Tan Yew Huat v Sin Joo Huat Hardware: Winding Up & Contractual Mistake(Aug 2024) Tan Yew Huat v Sin Joo Huat Hardware: Winding Up on Just & Equitable Grounds & Mistake of Fact(Oct 2023) AYD v AYE: Child Custody, Relocation to USA, and Access Rights Dispute(Feb 2012)
BT Tan & Co	4 cases	17% of cases	Ang Kin Chiew v Ang Boon Chye: Partnership Dispute over Food Court Businesses(Apr 2006) Sri Jaya v RHB Bank: Interpretation of Consent Judgment & Interest Calculation(Sep 2001) Tan Hock Keng v L & M Group Investments Ltd: Breach of Contract & Interpretation of Contractual Terms(Sep 2001)
B T Tan and Co	3 cases	13% of cases	Yeo Gek Lang Susie v Guan Soon Development: Amendment of Articles of Association and Shareholder Registration(Nov 2005) Jumabhoy Rafiq v Scotts Investments: Director's Remuneration & Indemnification Dispute(Oct 2004) Lee Kiang Leng Stanley v Lee Han Chew: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings and Unfair Preference(Jul 2004)
BT Tan & Company	1 cases	4% of cases	Ong Beng Chong v Jayaram Victoria: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Rights(Mar 2009)
B T Tan & Partners	1 cases	4% of cases	Ong Beng Chong v Goh Kim Thong: Recovery of House Without Land Title Dispute(Jul 2010)
BT Tan and Co	1 cases	4% of cases	Scotts Investments v Jumabhoy: Director's Remuneration & Interpretation of 'Costs and Expenses'(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Bar Tien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 9 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	4%
Lost	103.1 parties avg	3.1	42%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Won	105.0 parties avg	5.0	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2005	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	27.3 parties avg	7.3
2008	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2009	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Bar Tien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4%)	4%
Lost	10(42%)	42%
Partial	3(13%)	13%
Won	10(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	75,500.00	5,807.6913 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 24 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Yew Huat v Sin Joo Huat Hardware: Winding Up & Contractual Mistake 06 Aug 2024 Tan Joo See (Appellant, Intervener)Won	06 Aug 2024	Tan Joo See (Appellant, Intervener): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed regarding the common mistake issue. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tan Yew Huat v Sin Joo Huat Hardware: Winding Up on Just & Equitable Grounds & Mistake of Fact 03 Oct 2023 Tan Joo See (Claimant)Lost	03 Oct 2023	Tan Joo See (Claimant): Application dismissedApplication for specific performance dismissed.
3	Ong Beng Chong v Commissioner of Stamp Duties: Stamp Duty Assessment on Instruments for Vacant Possession 04 Apr 2019 Ong Beng Chong (Appellant)Won	04 Apr 2019	Ong Beng Chong (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; no penalties payable.
4	Edmund Tie & Company v Savills Residential: Appeal for Commission Dispute over Co-broking Agreement 18 Apr 2018 Edmund Tie & Company (SEA) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	18 Apr 2018	Edmund Tie & Company (SEA) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application for leave to appeal dismissedThe applicant's application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs fixed at $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Devagi v Tommy Wong: Misuse of Funds in Neptune Court Owners’ Association Defamation Proceedings 28 Jun 2017 SHAIKH ANWAR ISHAK (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jun 2017	SHAIKH ANWAR ISHAK (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiffs' claim allowed; the court ordered a refund of the misspent monies. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Alterm Consortech v Public Prosecutor: Copyright Infringement in Termite Control Specifications 26 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	26 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; convictions dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Tan Kim Guan v Tan Tee Theng: Specific Performance for HDB Flat Sale Dispute 13 Mar 2012 Tan Kim Guan (Plaintiff)Won	13 Mar 2012	Tan Kim Guan (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffOrder for specific performance granted. Costs to follow the event and to be taxed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	AYD v AYE: Child Custody, Relocation to USA, and Access Rights Dispute 28 Feb 2012 AYE (Respondent, Husband)Partial	28 Feb 2012	AYE (Respondent, Husband): Appeal dismissed in part; joint custody grantedHusband's appeal against the wife's relocation was dismissed, but he was granted joint custody of the children.
9	Ong Beng Chong v Goh Kim Thong: Recovery of House Without Land Title Dispute 06 Jul 2010 Ong Beng Chong (Plaintiff)Won	06 Jul 2010	Ong Beng Chong (Plaintiff): Order for Vacant Possession GrantedPlaintiff was granted an order for vacant possession of the property, conditional upon paying the defendant SGD 74,000 as compensation for the replacement cost of the house. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Abdul Hamid v Nico Marine: Striking Out Claim for Outstanding Wages Due to Forged Crew Agreements 22 Nov 2009 Nico Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	22 Nov 2009	Nico Marine Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to not strike out the claim was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Ong Beng Chong v Jayaram Victoria: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Rights 23 Mar 2009 Ong Beng Chong (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Mar 2009	Ong Beng Chong (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for vacant possession was dismissed.
12	Worldwide Convention Planners v Lee Khiam Long: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Duties 14 Sep 2008 Worldwide Convention Planners Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	14 Sep 2008	Worldwide Convention Planners Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed as unmeritorious and lacking in proof.
13	Lai Shit Har v Lau Yu Man: Winding-Up Application as Abuse of Process 27 Jul 2008 Wong Yiat Hong Raymond (Appellant)Won	27 Jul 2008	Wong Yiat Hong Raymond (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; no order as to costs here and below.
14	Guan Soon Development v Yeo Gek Lang: Share Transfer, Pre-emption Rights & Articles of Association 13 Jun 2006 Teo Cheng Woon (Respondent)Won	13 Jun 2006	Teo Cheng Woon (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court ruled in favor of the respondent. No monetary amount was specified. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
15	Ang Kin Chiew v Ang Boon Chye: Partnership Dispute over Food Court Businesses 06 Apr 2006 Teng Lak Hoon (Defendant, Respondent)Won	06 Apr 2006	Teng Lak Hoon (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Yeo Gek Lang Susie v Guan Soon Development: Amendment of Articles of Association and Shareholder Registration 10 Nov 2005 Teo Soo Swan (Plaintiff)Won	10 Nov 2005	Teo Soo Swan (Plaintiff): Application allowedApplication to compel the defendant company to register the plaintiff as a shareholder was allowed. Costs are to be paid by the company to the plaintiffs, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Jumabhoy Rafiq v Scotts Investments: Director's Remuneration & Indemnification Dispute 05 Oct 2004 Jumabhoy Rafiq (Appellant)Lost	05 Oct 2004	Jumabhoy Rafiq (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay costs.
18	Lee Kiang Leng Stanley v Lee Han Chew: Stay of Bankruptcy Proceedings and Unfair Preference 18 Jul 2004 Lee Han Chew (trading as Joe Li Electrical Supplies) (Petitioner, Respondent)Partial	18 Jul 2004	Lee Han Chew (trading as Joe Li Electrical Supplies) (Petitioner, Respondent): Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in partAppeal against the decision of the assistant registrar was partially allowed and partially dismissed.
19	Scotts Investments v Jumabhoy: Director's Remuneration & Interpretation of 'Costs and Expenses' 04 Feb 2004 Rafiq Jumabhoy (Defendant)Lost	04 Feb 2004	Rafiq Jumabhoy (Defendant): Counterclaim Dismissed in partThe third defendant’s counterclaim was dismissed save for the inquiry as to out-of-pocket expenses paid on behalf of Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
20	Rafiq Jumabhoy v Scotts Investments: Retrospective Leave for Counterclaim in Compulsory Liquidation 19 May 2003 Rafiq Jumabhoy (Plaintiff)Won	19 May 2003	Rafiq Jumabhoy (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiff's application for leave to commence and continue with his counterclaim was allowed retrospectively.
21	Lim Ek Kian v Public Prosecutor: Forgery for Cheating & Witness Credibility 17 Mar 2003 Lim Ek Kian (Appellant)Lost	17 Mar 2003	Lim Ek Kian (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
22	Sri Jaya v RHB Bank: Interpretation of Consent Judgment & Interest Calculation 18 Sep 2001 RHB Bank Bhd (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	18 Sep 2001	RHB Bank Bhd (Defendant, Respondent): PartialThe court ruled that post-judgment interest should be calculated on the composite sum of principal plus interest up to the date of the judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Tan Hock Keng v L & M Group Investments Ltd: Breach of Contract & Interpretation of Contractual Terms 02 Sep 2001 Tan Hock Keng (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Sep 2001	Tan Hock Keng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim was dismissed; judgment was entered against the plaintiff on the defendant's counterclaim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	Sri Jaya v RHB Bank: Mortgagee's Duty, Negligence, Corporate Veil & Land Sale 09 Oct 2000 RHB Bank Berhad (Defendant)Lost	09 Oct 2000	RHB Bank Berhad (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against the Defendant; the defendant was found to be negligent in the sale of the property (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).