Ting Jun Heng

Ting Jun Heng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Ting Jun Heng has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Central Chambers Law Corporation	3 cases	Ramasamy s/o Karuppan Chettiar Simone B Chettiar

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ting Jun Heng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ting Jun Heng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sgca-93 29 Sep 2021	29 Sep 2021	Respondent	WonSuccessfully resisted the appeal. Awarded attendance costs of $750 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2021-sghc-44 24 Feb 2021	24 Feb 2021	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; first defendant responsible for 65% of the liability and the second defendant 35%. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
3	2020-sghc-211 01 Oct 2020	01 Oct 2020	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; liability apportioned 65% to the first defendant and 35% to the second defendant. Plaintiff not contributorily negligent. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.