Tong Seak Kan

Tong Seak Kan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tong Seak Kan has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Harish Kumar Harish Kumar s/o Champaklal Low Weng Hong Josephine Chee Fei Josephine Chee Jonathan Toh
Mallal & Namazie	1 case	Tan Teng Muan Loh Li Qin

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tong Seak Kan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25.0%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25.0%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tong Seak Kan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,500.00	4,500.001 cases	1
USD	3,880,000.00	3,880,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghca-1 04 Jan 2023	04 Jan 2023	Respondent	PartialAppeal allowed in part; Judge’s decision in respect of the JS Energy Share set aside.
2	2022-sghca-16 18 Apr 2022	18 Apr 2022	Respondent	LostLeave to appeal against the decision of the Judge was granted.
3	2019-sghc-190 15 Aug 2019	15 Aug 2019	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $3,880,000 (assumed USD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2016-sghc-204 26 Sep 2016	26 Sep 2016	Plaintiff	WonPlaintiffs were successful in striking out portions of the Defence and were awarded costs of $4,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).