Transocean Oil Pte Ltd
Transocean Oil Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms.
Legal Representation
Transocean Oil Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
| Navin & Co LLP | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Transocean Oil Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2014 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Transocean Oil Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(50.0%) |
| Partial | 1(50.0%) |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 1 |
| 2014 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
23 Jul 2015 | Applicant, Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed in part; the court allowed the appeal against the Judge’s decision to strike out the Appellant’s claim and to set aside the warrant of arrest. In the circumstances, the court also reserved the question of damages for wrongful arrest to the trial judge after the relevant findings have been made. |
26 Jun 2014 | Plaintiff, Respondent | LostPlaintiff's appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s striking out order was dismissed. |