Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd
Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 83.3% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew and Napier LLC | 1 case |
Drew & Napier | 1 case |
Amica Law LLC | 1 case |
Allen & Gledhill | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.3
- Complex Cases
- 5 (83.3%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 24.5 parties avg |
Partial | 14.0 parties avg |
Won | 34.3 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2006 | 12.0 parties avg |
2005 | 45.0 parties avg |
2003 | 14.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(33.3%) |
Partial | 1(16.7%) |
Won | 3(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2006 | 1 1 |
2005 | 2 13 |
2003 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
11 Dec 2006 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s order was dismissed. |
29 Dec 2005 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the plaintiff, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Dec 2005 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed with costs here and below. Security deposit to be released to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
06 Oct 2005 | Respondent | LostTrek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd appealed against the decision to allow the application. |
11 May 2005 | Plaintiff, Defendant | WonTrek's claims in Suit 609/2002 and Suit 672/2002 were allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Aug 2003 | Plaintiff | PartialAppeal allowed in part; the right to make the discovery application was reserved before the trial judge. |