Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd

Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	3 cases	Kelvin Poon Alyssa Leong Chai Wei Han Farrah Salam
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Kelvin Poon Poon Kin Mun Kelvin Farah Salam Christine Huang Melissa Kue

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.0
Complex Cases: 5 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	111.0 parties avg	11.0	20.0%
Neutral	111.0 parties avg	11.0	20.0%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	20.0%
Won	29.5 parties avg	9.5	40.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2018	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2015	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2012	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2010	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Neutral	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Partial	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	2(40.0%)	40.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	189,000.00	63,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2019-sghc-73 14 Mar 2019	14 Mar 2019	Defendant	NeutralPlaintiffs did not seek costs against the first defendant as it was a nominal defendant.
2	2018-sgca-79 21 Nov 2018	21 Nov 2018	Appellant	PartialThe appellant was jointly and severally liable to pay damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50 and costs of $189,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for Civil Appeal No 168 of 2015 and the related summonses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2015-sghc-207 05 Aug 2015	05 Aug 2015	Defendant	LostCounterclaim for bidding exercise to proceed dismissed.
4	2012-sghc-227 11 Nov 2012	11 Nov 2012	Defendant	WonThe defendant prevailed in the action to set aside the Consent Order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2010-sghc-136 02 May 2010	02 May 2010	Respondent, Defendant	WonPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.