Westacre Investments Inc

Westacre Investments Inc is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Westacre Investments Inc has been represented by 1 law firm and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Wee Swee Teow & Co	4 cases	Khoo Boo Jin Giam Chin Toon Giam Chin Toon SC Tan Hsuan Boon Seow Ai Lin Mark Lee Peter Chia

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Westacre Investments Inc's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 4 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Partial	26.5 parties avg	6.5	33.3%
Won	35.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2015	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2012	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Westacre Investments Inc's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Partial	2(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	3(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	15,047,844.44	15,047,844.441 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sgca-51 30 Aug 2016	30 Aug 2016	Respondent, Appellant	PartialAppeal against the Judge’s refusal to make the garnishee order against Deuteron absolute was allowed.
2	2015-sghc-143 26 May 2015	26 May 2015	Plaintiff	WonProvisional garnishee order under Summons in Chambers No 2151/2005/B made final. The sum is based on the amount of US$15,047,844.44 stated by the JC in its statement of claim, and will also include the interest that has accrued since then (assumed USD, as the judgment references USD amounts).
3	2012-sgca-8 30 Jan 2012	30 Jan 2012	Respondent	PartialAppeal dismissed to the extent that the garnishee orders absolute were set aside.
4	2011-sghc-123 18 May 2011	18 May 2011	Judgment Creditor	WonSummons 5282 allowed; provisional garnishee orders made final; Judgment Debtor to pay costs of the garnishee proceedings to the Judgment Creditor. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2008-sgca-48 29 Dec 2008	29 Dec 2008	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs here and below as well as the usual consequential orders, and set aside the order made by the Judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2006-sghc-210 27 Nov 2006	27 Nov 2006	Judgment Creditor	LostThe court set aside the registration of the English judgment in Singapore.