Bills of Lading Disputes
Bills of Lading Disputes is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2001 to 2006.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Bills of Lading Disputes, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill50.00% success rate | 2 cases66.7% of area |
Rajah & Tann100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Andrew Ee & Co100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Hee Theng Fong & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
JC Ho & Kang0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Bills of Lading Disputes, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Kenny Yap0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Yap Yin Soon100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Hee Theng Fong0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Leonard Chia0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Ian Teo100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Joanne Chia0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Andrew Ee66.67% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Steven Chong100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Tan T'eng Ta' Benedict0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Kohe Hassan100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Vasiliy Golovnin: Credit Agricole Suisse SA v Far Eastern Shipping Co Plc - Issue Estoppel & Wrongful Vessel Arrest | High Court | 09 Jul 2006 | Orders in terms of prayers (2), (3), (4) of the defendants’ application granted. Costs fixed at $20,000 to the defendants exclusive of disbursements. |
2 | Ding Leng Kong v Mok Kwong Yue: Moneylender Act & Enforceability of Loans | High Court | 18 May 2003 | Plaintiff's claims allowed to the extent stated. First defendant’s counterclaim allowed. |
3 | PT GE Astra Finance v The Owners of the Ship "Pioneer Glory": Damages for Wrongful Detention of Equipment | High Court | 28 Jun 2001 | Appeal Allowed |