Deposits Law
Deposits Law is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2013 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Deposits Law, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Covenant Chambers LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Lee Chai & Boon LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Deposits Law, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Lee Ee Yang0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Tay Yong Seng0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Toh Jia Jing Vivian0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Wong En Hui Charis0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Benaiah Lim Oon Kuan0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Teo Hui Yan Sarah0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Shjoneman Tan Sze Ern0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Tan Teng Muan100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Loh Li Qin100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Li Jialin v Wingcrown Investment: Deposits, Liquidated Damages & Penalties | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 05 Nov 2024 | Appeal Allowed |
2 | - | 03 Nov 2024 | Unknown | |
3 | Hon Chin Kong v Yip Fook Mun: Contract Formation, Variation, and Remedies for Breach of Contract | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 08 Nov 2017 | Suit dismissed with costs to the defendants. |
4 | World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & Defamation | High Court | 09 Apr 2013 | Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1. |