Nominal Plaintiff

Nominal Plaintiff is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 1 cases from 2014 to 2014.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Nominal Plaintiff, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Legal Solutions LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Joseph Tan (1 cases) Joanna Poh (1 cases)	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)
Eden Law Corporation100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	June Lim (1 cases)	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)
One Legal LLC100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Anthony Soh (1 cases)	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)

Leading lawyers practicing in Nominal Plaintiff, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Anthony Soh100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)
Joseph Tan0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)
Joanna Poh0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)
June Lim100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)

Displaying 1 most recent judgments out of 1 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action	High Court	12 Oct 2014	Application for security for costs dismissed.