Joseph Tan

Joseph Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 39.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 28% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Joseph Tan has demonstrated expertise across 80 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and shipping law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	13 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admiralty Jurisdiction and Arrest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Fees	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contentious Business Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Certainty of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of fidelity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Nominal Plaintiff	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Airline Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interline Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Passenger Sales Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Protection	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transportation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Joseph Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Joseph Tan has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kenneth Tan Partnership	6 cases	33% of cases	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification(Dec 2004) Pirelli v PSA: Hague-Visby Rules & Weight Limitation for Damaged Goods(Feb 2003) Swiss Singapore v Navalmar: Mandatory Injunction for Bill of Lading Issuance Dispute(Nov 2002)
Legal Solutions LLC	6 cases	33% of cases	Avra Commodities v China Coal Solution: Contract Formation & Intention(Dec 2019) Fairmacs Shipping v Harikutai: Conversion of River Sand & Damages Assessment(Dec 2014) Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action(Oct 2014)
Joo Toon & Co	2 cases	11% of cases	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Will Construction, Testamentary Trust, Testator's Intention(Jun 2009) Uzbekistan Airways v Jetspeed Travel: Indemnity for Fictitious Airline Routes(Aug 2008)
Kenneth Tan Kong & Tan	1 cases	6% of cases	Tan Kok Ing v Ang Boon Aik: Deliberate Omission of Evidence & Impact on Fair Trial(Sep 2002)
Nanyang Law LLC	1 cases	6% of cases	JWR Pte Ltd v Syn Kok Kay: Taxation of Costs Under Legal Profession Act(Oct 2019)
Joseph Chen & Co	1 cases	6% of cases	Ishwaribai Ramchand Daswani v Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani: Setting Aside Consent Orders for Account of Assets(Mar 2009)
DSCT Law Corporation	1 cases	6% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Joseph Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 5 (28%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Lost	83.0 parties avg	3.0	44%
Partial	25.3 parties avg	5.3	11%
Won	73.1 parties avg	3.1	39%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2010	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2014	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Joseph Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(6%)	6%
Lost	8(44%)	44%
Partial	2(11%)	11%
Won	7(39%)	39%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
GBP	137,166.83	137,166.831 cases	1
SGD	271,582.12	54,316.425 cases	5
USD	1,607,076.00	803,538.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 111	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2014	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 18 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Avra Commodities v China Coal Solution: Contract Formation & Intention 23 Dec 2019 China Coal Solution (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	23 Dec 2019	China Coal Solution (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $1,465,850 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies the amount in US dollars).
2	JWR Pte Ltd v Syn Kok Kay: Taxation of Costs Under Legal Profession Act 23 Oct 2019 Syn Kok Kay (trading as Patrick Chin Syn & Co) (Respondent)Lost	23 Oct 2019	Syn Kok Kay (trading as Patrick Chin Syn & Co) (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to resist taxation of costs dismissed.
3	Fairmacs Shipping v Harikutai: Conversion of River Sand & Damages Assessment 11 Dec 2014 Fairmacs Shipping & Transport Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	11 Dec 2014	Fairmacs Shipping & Transport Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; damages awarded in the amount of $141,226 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to US dollar amounts).
4	Nordic International Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Security for Costs in Derivative Action 12 Oct 2014 Morten Innhaug (Defendant)Lost	12 Oct 2014	Morten Innhaug (Defendant): Application for security for costs dismissed with costsApplication for security for costs dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Nordic International Ltd: Dispute over Arbitration Rights in Joint Venture 08 Jul 2014 Nordic International Ltd (Defendant)Won	08 Jul 2014	Nordic International Ltd (Defendant): Judgment in favour of defendantThe application for summary judgement against the defendant was dismissed.
6	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Abdullah: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 13 Sep 2010 Rosman bin Abdullah (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2010	Rosman bin Abdullah (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was convicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
7	Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Derivative Action & Director's Duties 23 May 2010 Morten Innhaug (Defendant)Won	23 May 2010	Morten Innhaug (Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for leave to commence a derivative action was dismissed. Costs of S$6,500 were awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Baldor Electric v Liew Chin Choy: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy 27 Jan 2010 WEG Export Adora S.A. (Defendant)Dismissed	27 Jan 2010	WEG Export Adora S.A. (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed the claim against WEG Export Adora S.A.
9	Low Ah Cheow v Ng Hock Guan: Will Construction, Testamentary Trust, Testator's Intention 23 Jun 2009 Nicholas Ng Zhi Kai (Appellant)Partial	23 Jun 2009	Nicholas Ng Zhi Kai (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe court found that the Testator did not intend to leave the Estate to Sebastian absolutely as the sole beneficiary. The Testator intended to leave the Estate to Sebastian on trust for those of the Testator’s family members who are entitled to a share of the Estate pursuant to s 7, rr 2 and 3 of the Intestate Succession Act (Cap 146, 1985 Rev Ed).
10	Ishwaribai Ramchand Daswani v Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani: Setting Aside Consent Orders for Account of Assets 22 Mar 2009 Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani (Defendant)Lost	22 Mar 2009	Mohanlal Ramchand Daswani (Defendant): Summons dismissedThe defendant's summons to set aside the orders was dismissed.
11	Uzbekistan Airways v Jetspeed Travel: Indemnity for Fictitious Airline Routes 07 Aug 2008 Uzbekistan Airways (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Aug 2008	Uzbekistan Airways (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of GBP 137,166.83 for the aggregate differences in fare between the lowest official fare applicable to each of the actual journeys flown that British Airways was entitled to and the pro-rated amount British Airways received, based on the fictitious routes.
12	Hub Warrior v QBE Insurance: Negligence, Marine Insurance & Rectification 27 Dec 2004 Hub Warrior Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Dec 2004	Hub Warrior Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for damages and rectification was dismissed with costs.
13	Pirelli v PSA: Hague-Visby Rules & Weight Limitation for Damaged Goods 20 Feb 2003 The Metopolitan Electricity Authority (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Feb 2003	The Metopolitan Electricity Authority (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe court determined that the limitation quantum applicable to the three damaged drums is based on the actual weight damaged, yielding a limitation quantum of $151,814.97.
14	Swiss Singapore v Navalmar: Mandatory Injunction for Bill of Lading Issuance Dispute 12 Nov 2002 Navalmar U.K. Ltd (Defendant)Lost	12 Nov 2002	Navalmar U.K. Ltd (Defendant): Injunction granted against defendantMandatory injunction granted against the defendant, with variations to address discrepancies in the bills of lading.
15	Tan Kok Ing v Ang Boon Aik: Deliberate Omission of Evidence & Impact on Fair Trial 16 Sep 2002 Famco Boat Services (Defendant)Won	16 Sep 2002	Famco Boat Services (Defendant): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Guan Chong Cocoa v Pratiwi Shipping: Mareva Injunction for Damaged Cocoa Beans 30 Aug 2002 Pratiwi Shipping S A (Defendant)Won	30 Aug 2002	Pratiwi Shipping S A (Defendant): Application DismissedThe Plaintiffs' application for a mareva injunction was dismissed against the Defendant.
17	Tom-Reck Security Services v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Immigrant Employment & Corporate Criminal Liability 18 Feb 2001 Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	18 Feb 2001	Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the fine of $120,000 was ordered to be refunded to Tom-Reck. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Sintalow Hardware v Ricwil: Dispute over Goods, Services & Fiduciary Duties 12 Jun 2000 Sintalow Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jun 2000	Sintalow Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Sintalow in the amount of $145,082.12 plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).